Call us for a free consultation

Bicycle Accident

Bicyclist Sustains Multiple Fractures

On September 17, 2011, the plaintiff, a sixty-three-year-old male, was cycling aside a busy Greater Boston roadway. As he crossed an intersecting street, the defendant attempted to make a left-hand turn directly into the plaintiff’s path, ejecting him from his bicycle. Plaintiff’s counsel alleged the defendant operated her vehicle negligently in that she carelessly turned into the plaintiff’s path while he enjoyed the right of way. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff was comparatively at fault as he was not within a crosswalk at the time of impact and entered the intersection before ensuring the path was safe.

In the accident, the plaintiff sustained several rib fractures, a non-displaced right patella fracture, and, most significantly, a C2 compression fracture with a possible vertebral artery dissection. The attending doctors closely monitored the plaintiff for six days in the intensive care unit. Once they felt the artery dissection was stable, the plaintiff was discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility; the possible artery dissection was safely managed with medications for several months post-accident and resolved entirely.

The plaintiff was treated conservatively for approximately six months. His doctors agreed that surgery was not warranted for any of his injuries. In fact, the plaintiff’s orthopedic physician discharged him from any future medical care in May 2012, only eight months post-accident. The plaintiff has returned to his everyday lifestyle and has no pain resulting from the injuries he sustained.

Your Recovery Starts With One Call

Talk Directly with a Seasoned Attorney About Your Case

Related Articles

CCM
Who Is Liable When an Amazon, FedEx, or UPS Delivery Truck Causes a Boston Crash?

An Amazon, FedEx, or UPS logo on a delivery truck does not always tell you who is legally responsible when that truck causes a crash. Determining liability requires looking at who employed or controlled the

CCM
What Does M.G.L. c. 90, § 7 Require for Motorcycle Helmets in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts law requires motorcycle operators and passengers to wear protective headgear that meets the state’s helmet standards. M.G.L. c. 90, § 7 has one helmet exception for a motorcyclist age 18 or older taking part

Personal Injury
What Is the Implied Warranty of Habitability in Massachusetts?

The implied warranty of habitability requires residential rental property in Massachusetts to be fit for human habitation. State building and sanitary codes provide important minimum standards, but an isolated code violation does not automatically amount