Call us for a free consultation

Pedestrian Accident

Pedestrian Hit By Vehicle

On May 27, 2011, Plaintiff, a 73-year Iranian woman visiting Boston was standing on a sidewalk in between the Boston Common and the Public Garden. According to witnesses, the woman entered the crosswalk “against the light” and proceeded to try and cross this very busy intersection. A vehicle in the far travel lane veered to his right to go around the Plaintiff and continue on Charles Street. Defendant, following directly behind the aforesaid vehicle, stated that she could not see Plaintiff until it was too late and struck her with the front of her car. Witnesses estimated her speed between 10-15 miles per hour at impact. Based on witness statements, as well as a statement was given by the defendant, the investigating officers decided that no ticket would issue.

The case was basically defended by relying on the fact that witnesses stated the Plaintiff had entered the intersection against the pedestrian signal. Plaintiff’s counsel was successful in finding a witness who, although listed on the police report as being from Boston, was actually an individual from Puerto Rico vacationing in Boston. This particular witness stated that he believed Plaintiff entered the roadway while the sign still was in her favor, but that after traversing half the roadway, the sign changed to don’t walk. The witness further stated that one car stopped to let her continue within the crosswalk and that Plaintiff was within a few feet of reaching the far sidewalk when she was struck by Defendant’s car.

Plaintiff suffered nondisplaced fractures of her sacrum and left patella as well as a comminuted fracture of her pubic rami. Doctors agreed that each of the fractures would be treated non-operatively. Plaintiff remained in the hospital for five days before being released. Thereafter, she enjoyed an excellent healing result except for her knee. Plaintiff developed tricompartmental osteoarthritis. Defendant’s expert opined that the osteoarthritis was in no way caused by any injuries sustained in the accident. Her treating physician stated that he could not say within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that the arthritis was in any way causally related to the accident.

The case was settled for $170,000.00.

Your Recovery Starts With One Call

Talk Directly with a Seasoned Attorney About Your Case

Related Articles

CCM
What Evidence Should Be Preserved Immediately After a Massachusetts Truck Accident?

The evidence that could help prove your Massachusetts truck accident claim may disappear sooner than you think. Surveillance footage can be overwritten, damaged vehicles may be repaired, and important trucking records may be discarded under

CCM
Who Can Be Held Liable For Wide Turn Truck Accidents?

The last thing that anybody expects to happen is that they will be injured in a crash caused by a negligent truck driver. However, truck accidents can occur in and around Boston, including crashes involving

CCM
How Does Massachusetts’ Three-Year Personal Injury Statute of Limitations (M.G.L. c. 260, § 2A) Apply to Truck Accidents?

After a truck accident, injured people often focus on medical treatment and insurance matters before thinking about a lawsuit. In Massachusetts, most personal injury lawsuits arising from truck crashes must be filed within three years